Monday, May 25, 2009

Lower Left Abdominal Pain More Condition_symptoms

HOW TO KILL A PERSON WITHOUT THE HANDS OF BLOOD FILLED

PLACE EVENT Navona in Rome 2009 / TESTIMONY OF THE MOTHER, MARIA-PIA Maoloni:

DEO-CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION:
WHEN DEMOCRACY TAKES THE COLORS OF THE DICTATORSHIP

Maoloni My name is Maria-Pia, the mother of Fiona (10 years) and Milla (6), two innocent victims of adult perversion.
My fight to save my children is not only a battle against child but organized crime is a war against indifference and ignorance of the people before the massacre of the innocence of our children. This network

Soil well-structured criminal is not only composed of perverted pedophiles

but also their accomplices, perverts institutionalized, which protect them or turn a blind eye to these crimes against humanity. These associates often hold social functions legitimate in the upper echelons of society and particularly within the judiciary. The objectives of this network are mainly: the power, the perverse pleasure and money.

To achieve these goals, their means are the omerta of the press; retaliation (threats, intimidation), so to exploit the fears of people, spread false information to discredit and stifle the truth about these crimes and let the people in ignorance of this treacherous world, and finally, isolating victims and people who have the courage to defend them.

The isolation of the abused child and parent is a protective
purposes sought by the evil institutionalized.

ISOLATION OF THE CHILD VICTIM OF CRIMINAL NETWORK-DEO
Indeed, the trap is to believe that we will place the child in a
"

neutral" to allow "justice" to take decisions in "the best interests " of the child. In this way, the child finds himself placed in an institution for a long period and therefore legal under the influence. This has resulted over the child to feel punished for talking about sexual abuse he suffered. So the child who is already sexually abused becomes the victim of judicial abuse. Therefore, under the weight of guilt, the child will struggle to trust again on his experiences as a victim. The child suffers from a profound sense drop against the heavy burden suffered sexual trauma that he must bear alone and in silence. Moreover, the feeling of distress in the child victim of sexual abuse and placed in an institution, is accentuated by the fact that he sees himself separated from his parental background and its protective parent. Article 38 of Decree of the Youth Assistance (Belgium) has become a trap for the innocent victims and abused for the protective parent. Indeed, delegating their "power of decision" to the Director of SAJ Service (Youth Outreach) or SPJ Service (Judicial Protection), some judges disempowering facing the effective protection of minors against sexual executioners. If the protective parent disagrees with the decision of placement of SAJ or SPJ, he says he can make an appeal on the basis of Article 37 of Decree of the Youth Assistance. However, be aware that this alleged action is also a trap for the victims as most of the time the parent finds himself facing the same juvenile court judge who, in most cases, confirm the decision of the Director of Foreign Assistance Youth is to say the decision to place the child in an institution in order to remove its protective parent. So the circle is complete!

The tactics of institutionalized evil is to imprison the child away from the protective parent. The child finds itself in a state institution in the "expectation" of a decision that will place it in the parent executioner.
Institutionalization is a springboard for the judiciary to have the hold on quick decisions on the expulsion of the child's parent protector. It will make you believe that this is a period of investment " very short" to allow you to "step back " and allow justice " to see more clearly, r" ... We will also tell you that it is " in the best interests of the child " (nice phrase used all the sauces to make you swallow couloeuvres!). The first objective of the organization pedo-criminal is reached:
isolate the child victim and prevent him from speaking about sex crimes he has suffered.
It should be noted that despite all these pressures and suffering, if the child has the courage to speak again on his traumatic experience, perverts institutionalized argue that the child " fantasizing " or was " alienated" by the protective parent and is thus not " credible. "

In this way, avoiding to protect my children against sexual violence they suffer and exposing the middle pedophile father, the institutional and judicial Mons becomes complicit in these crimes. My children have been reduced by the latter as "objects of blackmail" so that I remove my criminal complaints and that I stop all procedures to charge the father, Rocco Antonini and paternal grandfather, Roberto Antonini.
When I lived in Belgium with my two children, I knocked on every door of the Belgian institutions to seek help (Child Focus, Victim Service, Youth Outreach, SOS Children, children's associations, etc.). All these institutions that alleviate the collective consciousness, after the Dutroux case in Belgium, and trying to show that the child is currently well supported and protected in this country! The noose was closing more about us! My children and I were in distress and it does not help us, but we were trapped!

My children are victims of a pedophile ring.
For six years I expect JUSTICE! I still believe as I continue the legal proceedings. However, I hope for my children, who are now in the hands of these criminals that justice is not a utopia!

justice when the truth becomes utopia is hampered by corruption . The only way to ensure the manifestation of the truth in a country Democratic, is to allow citizens to keep a critical eye on the progress of legal proceedings relating to child crime. This through information channels that provide access to a wide audience as the internet and the media (when they retain their independence and have the courage to face the problem of paedo-criminality! In Belgium, As part of my file is the absolute omerta!). Despite all the pressures and retaliation that Mons authorities subjected me to this day I still continue to fight for ascertaining the truth about rape and prostitution of my children. Despite my deep sadness and the heart torn out of a mom, I resisted arrest because their blackmail procedures mean abandoning my children in their experiences of battered victims.
When was the victim of sexual crimes, it is essential to be able to rebuild, we recognize you as a victim.
Mons authorities wanted to reverse the values by pretending that my children were liars instead of being victims. This attitude is a denial of justice for both my daughters and therefore, a denial right! should not be a great legal expert to understand that, in my case, the interpretation of the Act and in particular its non
application
are made by the authorities in Mons for the sole purpose of burying TRUTH rape on my children the benefit of the protection of an organization pedo-criminal! We all understood that this case "goes beyond" widely Antonini (father and son) and that the decisions of justice Mons (Belgium) are systematically biased in favor of them only in order to protect others accomplices these crimes inflicted on my children that, despite an impressive number of testimonials, medical and psychological reports for the credibility of the revelations of abuse by my eldest daughter. Fiona was aged four and a half during his first secrets about sexual abuse by her father, her paternal grandfather and other adults (January 2004). She continued to speak and to draw the horror of his experience just before his repatriation to Belgium (May 2007). So for three years, my daughter had the courage, despite his three-institutionalization, to speak and call "Help" so that we can, we, adults, the issue of all his sufferings. But no authority has so far had the will to oppose these crimes and protect my two children.

WHY? My

illegal deprivation of liberty following arrest warrant issued by illegitimate and the Court of Mons, the illegal abduction and kidnapping of my children by the Belgian authorities, the separation from my children and unlawful refusal of any contact between my girls, me, their mother tongue and the whole industry (since this
THREE YEARS already!
), The total lack of protection in respect of my children against sexual violence they face currently in the middle paternal unsubstantiated charges on my sanity issued by psychologists at two under (C- of Bex Mons-Charleroi: Mrs Regina Lawrence, Mrs. Isabella Fadeur, Mr. Baeskens-Charlier Alain Delmotte Ms. Natasha) based on a bogus report of a young teacher (Ms. Saint Oil ); false calumnies and intellectuals drawn to against me by people who do not know me (SPJ Mons: Lethé Anne-de Greef ; SOS Children Mons Mr. Michel Gallez ) the evidence disappear, and the emotional blackmail of the director of youth assistance of Mons ( Mr. Taoufik Bensaïdi) , the trial of intention towards me; key witnesses not interviewed ... represent a massive violation of the Convention on the Rights of Man and Child, by the judicial authorities of Mons (Belgium). It is high time that the Tribunal and the institutions of Mons stops falling in the scandal committed crimes against two innocent victims, as are my children.

Through their decisions (Slowing of voluntary civil proceedings to prevent any contact between my children and myself, speeding the closure of the criminal case), Mons
authorities obviously cover the criminal acts of Antonini and thus become complicit in them.
Their decisions have also lost all credibility in the eyes of Belgian citizens and international as well as before the Italian authorities
because they voluntarily expose my children to the continuing danger of sexual violence in the paternal environment in which they are now. It is therefore urgent that these serious crimes and Inhuman stop! The real and visible failures that appear in my folder are clear evidence of a desire to harm the truth on my rape on children by Antonini and their accomplices.

ISOLATION OF PARENT PROTECTIVE
The protective parent, relying on the justice of his country and aid agencies for children, will have the reflex, like any other parent who find themselves in this same situation, contact them to entrust them with the revelations of abuse of her child and hope for the urgent establishment assistance measures for it.
Unfortunately, the protective parent will quickly realize its great isolation by using it wishes to make her child, especially when it understands that the institutionalized perverse wish to part with it and to incriminate a "pseudo-
dangerousness" to discredit and silence the truth of the crime committed on a child by members of the pedophile ring.

How to isolate the protective parent is to say he wants to protect her child from sexual abuse that suffered? The objectives of the institutionalized evil are identical to those referred to isolate the child victim of sexual abuse, namely:

Isolation
psychological: to make the protective parent is not credible in the labeling of " alienating "to her child, that is to say, suffering from" parental alienation syndrome . The SAP was established in 1986 by Richard Gardner, professor of child psychiatry at Columbia University. He said it is a psychological disorder that would reach the child when one parent carries on him, implicitly, a "brainwashing" to destroy the image of the other parent. When the operation is successful, the child rejects or demonizes the parent he loved before, and is indissolubly one with the alienating parent, according to desire it. This theory is not dangerous in its foundation but its use by the institutionalized evil in order to carry out the removal of the protective parent to her child. Indeed, this theory is often used in legal proceedings as a strategy to discredit the protective parent and in this way, making implausible the revelations of abuse of a child
. The institutionalized evil say that the protective parent has a "relationship

fusion" with his child, he is "alienating " for him and therefore "dangerous . In this way, we will proceed to place the child in an institution in order to remove the protective parent. This theory will used in cases where 'there are no physical signs of abuse on the child.
However, in cases of child sexual abuse or there are any signs of physical abuse (anal fissures, vulvitis and vaginitis, damage to the hymen)
, perverts say that institutionalized the protective parent is suffering from a psychiatric illness: " Munchausen syndrome by proxy . This syndrome describes a behavioral disorder of an adult towards a child abuse on the adult child which involves the voluntary production of physical or psychological symptoms.
In this way, by taxing the protective parent with "alienating
" or "dangerous patient , it will be easier for institutionalized evil, be separated from her child. The abuse of these two theories in litigation add another injury to the child as it is not in her own dramatic story and is totally denied in his suffering and the violence it has suffered.
physical confinement and / or geographic
: this second step is following the first (psychological isolation). In this case, the protective parent, called "dangerous" by the wicked will be isolated institutionalized in a psychiatric facility or an institution.
social and professional isolation : This third step is consecutive to the previous two (psychological and physical isolation and / or geographic). The aim of institutionalized evil is
isolate the protective parent's social and family fabric of reference: his deteriorating psychological identity, social and professional . The costs of procedures and legal-institutional harassment against the protective parent will increase its economic and psychological distress. costs of litigation is another means used by perverts institutionalized to stifle the truth of the crimes inflicted on the child victim, by constraining the protective parent in the continuation of its legal actions.

All this is a reflection of our plight for five years to try to save my two children from the hell of paedo-criminality.
I want to say that my experience mine and so I can translate it to other situations. I do not want to generalize my story, which was oriented towards the protection from criminal perverts institutionalized instead of protecting my two children. It would be unreasonable of me to say that all persons operating within the Tribunal and institutions of Mons (Belgium) are corrupted or not fully assume their responsibilities. The institutionalized evil that had a role in not protecting my children will recognize themselves and will one day serve their conscience, hoping they have one!

assistance as desired for my children and I have not found in Belgium, I was forced to come to Italy in order that justice be done and finally, my children are recognized as victims of sexual abuse by their father (Rocco Antonini

), their paternal grandfather ( Antonini Roberto ) and other adults (father and grandfather accompanied my eldest daughter, Fiona, in places or 'other adults were present who abused d her and other children present). Following the arrest warrant for child abduction issued by Judge
Véronique Laloux Tribunal de Mons (Belgium
), I was arrested in Italy. I stayed four days in jail and sixteen days of house arrest. Then I was tried by the Court of Appeal of Ancona (Italy) and released unconditionally. At the time of my arrest, my children were torn from me and placed in an Italian institution for seven months. I could not get visitation rights for two months after the confinement of my children for four hours per month. My children were in distress and felt lost in a foreign context, since they included not the Italian language (mother tongue is French) and they were cut off from their families and all their familiar landmarks.

Despite pressure from the Belgian authorities to repatriate my children, the Court of Appeal of Ancona (Italy) has revoked the repatriation of these in Belgium, taking into account the danger that my two daughters incur in returning to their father.

There is no room for words to express the full suffering of my children, my whole family and myself. It is a slow and painful agony that we experience in everyday life this face to impotence people who are close to us and our supporters but also against the cowardice and the absolute neglect of the authorities and institutions that could make decisions to safeguard my children, and who do not!

May 17, 2007, the Youth Court of Ancona (Italy),
when he was not competent
, issued a decision to return to my children in Belgium. This decision has ridden ILLEGALLY that of the Court of Appeal of Ancona (who had previously revoked the repatriation).
May 19, 2007, in the strictest secrecy and without I am informed, my children have been abducted while walking with other children of the institution, and returned to Belgium with their father executioner.

In May 2008 the Supreme Court of Cassation in Rome has reversed the decision issued by the Youth Court of Ancona, acknowledging its jurisdiction and affirming the continuation of my children on the Italian territory. But too late! My children are currently in Belgium!

For two years I have not heard from my children
. The father and the evil of institutionalized Mons (Belgium) opposing categorically any contact between my children and myself (even by phone!), making this an absolute disregard of the interests of my children and totally deny the international laws on the Rights of the Child and Man . Despite various requests that my parents and I were introduced to obtain these contacts, the authorities of Mons (Belgium) remain tight and take away various excuses to these contacts: slowing of civil proceedings, dismissal of hearings scheduled, setting hearings within extremely long (9 months to a year between two hearings), etc..

Maintaining this denial of contact with my children used to the institutionalized evil, emotional blackmail so that I stop the criminal proceedings and that I remove the charges of rape of minors dependents of the father, the great- paternal grandfather and "X".
Indeed,

December 21, 2007, the Director of Judicial Protection and Assistance to Youth Mons Mr. Taoufik BENSAID , I get called for an interview scheduled Dec. 20, 2007 in Belgium. Unable to get there (because I'm stuck in Italy following the arrest warrant European launched by my ex-husband Rocco ANTONINI against me for child abduction, while the same term has been revoked in Italy!), are the lawyers of both parties and the father, Rocco ANTONINI present therein. Mr. Taoufik BENSAID said during the interview will be allowed a phone call between my two daughters and myself, December 21, 2007 at 17h. A simple phone call that was, for me, a huge relief and hope because I am without news of my two children since the day they return to Belgium, that is to say, since May 19, 2007. It was then seven months I was without news of my two kids! Even telephone contact was refused by the father and his lawyers Master BARTHELEMY Jean-Emmanuel and Ms. Nathalie DePetris, lawyers to the Bar of Mons.
The next day, instead of my daughters as agreed at the end of the line is that Mr. BENSAID was on the phone and told me I had to stop the "war
", " change position "," make no more noise around this story ".... if I hoped to see my daughters. Mr. BENSAID suggested I withdraw my accusations of pedophilia dependent of the father and paternal grandfather.
recently, at the hearing on April 22, 2009
, Judge of the Court of Appeal of Mons (Belgium) had decided to postpone the hearing until May 13, 2009 to consider ways of contacts web-cam, between my children and myself. It should be noted that the authorities of Mons rushed to the acceleration of a dismissal of criminal case for rape of minor dependents of Antonini (father and son). Indeed, four days before the preliminary hearing in court for the return of Roberto Antonini Tribunal Fermo (Italy), the Court of Mons had decided on a non-place for the investigation file based on the same facts (rape of minors). This is for the sole purpose of demonstrating to the Italian authorities, and in this way by trying to influence them, that the criminal case was fenced by a Belgian non-place and there was therefore, in the Court of Mons, no charge charge for Antonini. Despite this, the Tribunal
Fermo (Italy) maintained the reference to justice of the grandfather and set the trial for the same criminal acts of rape of minors charge Roberto Antonini, on July 8, 2009.
against this decision does not proceed on the Belgian criminal case, I filed an appeal to the Supreme Court May 5, 2009. Following this, the father and his lawyer, Maître
Barthelemy Jean-Emmanuel (Bar Mons)
took the opportunity to write to the President of the Court of Appeal of Mons, in order to express their strong opposition on the establish contacts between mother and children (see letter from Bartholomew Master dated 11 May 2009). Master Bartholomew said in his letter, the denial of contact, this way: "...

it is not possible for my client to consider any agreement as we have just learned that Ms. Maoloni appealed in cassation against the sentence pronounced by the Chamber of Indictments of the Court of Appeal Mons dated April 21, confirming a nonsuit in favor of my client in the criminal proceeding. .... As for criminal proceedings in Italy, I have to date no information about Ms. intentiions Maoloni on the continuation of criminal proceedings at the expense of my client in Italy. I suppose, given the appeal lodged in Belgium, the procedure Italy will continue to respect my client . You will understand in this context that my client sends the clearest reservations about the attitude of the appellant and can not reasonably be reassured about the intentions of Ms. Maoloni persists to present it as "potential pedophile" . No agreement will be acted at the hearing on May 13 ... " In the minutes of the hearing on April 22, 2009 (see annex),
President of the Court of Appeal of Mons Mr. Pierre-André Wustefeld
stated: " ... The parties agree to consider been provisionally a device capable of enabling, in respect of the interests of children and each of the parties to begin a reconstruction of the relationship between children and Maria-Pia Maoloni . For this purpose, to allow parties to propose to the court a concrete, and the favorable opinion of the Public Prosecutor, the court shall continue the cause at the hearing on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at 5:40 p.m. for 20 '. "
Oddly, at the hearing on May 13, 2009, the same judge adopted a completely different attitude and decided to adjourn the trial in November 2009 ( So, six months later!
). What happened between the hearing on April 22 and that of 13 May? The answer is the appeal to the Supreme Court that I have filed May 5, 2009, against the decision to not proceed on the criminal case for rape of minors. Indeed, through this action, I maintain an open criminal proceedings in Belgium. In this context,
is easy to understand that the interest of my children and their well-being are completely ignored by the institutionalized evil of Mons. Their goal is to close this issue as quickly as possible criminal Belgian seems to disturb the tranquility the latter
. They use my children as objects of emotional blackmail so that I submit to their dictates that lies across the lines in my file: " as you continue your battle, you will not see your kids! "
The institutionalized evil of Mons use my children as a means of retaliation, so that I remove my complaints of rape of minors
and in this way, they can definitely put a lid on this boiling cauldron that disturbs both perverse serenity of this network pedo-criminal. incomensurable love I feel for my two children and faith guide me in this infernal battle and help me to keep hope for a clean and independent justice or "
law is equal for all
'and or' young victims, namely my two girls, are recognized in their victim status so they can finally rebuild itself in the world of adults who left their painful and indelible scars. I hope that justice is not just an illusion! Justice is human and therefore has its own limitations: those of theoretical knowledge, those the exact knowledge of the facts, that of his own individual choices in order to maintain integrity despite the pressures ...

This will be our perseverance and our intolerance against pedophilia will save all the children who need us to live with dignity in this world. Pedophilia is a social cancer because beyond the perversion of individual we have to fight people and sometimes even entire institutions who, behind their legitimate social function and respected, protected and therefore condone pedophilia in all its forms.
Maoloni Maria Pia

"Save a Child is to save mankind "

ARTICLE TRANSLATED INTO ITALIAN:

/ * Style Definitions * / table.MsoNormalTable {Mso-style-name: "Table Normal" mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0; mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0; mso-style-noshow: yes; mso-style-parent: ""; mso -padding-alt: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0in; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001 pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: "Times New Roman" mso-ansi-language: # 0400; mso-Fareast-language: # 0400; mso-bidi-language: # 0400;} PEDO-CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION: WHEN DEMOCRACY TAKES THE COLORS OF DICTATORSHIP
Maoloni My name is Maria-Pia, the mother of Fiona (10 years) and Milla (6 years), two innocent victims of adult perversion. My struggle for the protection of my child is not 'just a battle against organized crime, but child abuse is a war against indifference and ignorance of the people before the massacre of the innocence of our children. This well-structured network pedo-criminal and not 'just made
perverted pedophiles but also by the values accomplices, the "institutionalized perverse" to protect them or turn a blind eye to these crimes against humanity. These accomplices often occupy positions on the social ladder high enough in the so-called "upper echelons" of society, and even at the level of the judicial system. The goals of this network are the following: power, money and perverse pleasure. To achieve these aims, values are means: the silence of the press, and the retaliation (threats, intimidation) to exploit the fears of the people, spreading false information to discredit and bury the truth about these crimes, leaving the citizens in total ignorance of this wicked world, and finally, to isolate the victims and people who have the courage to defend them. isolation of the abused child and parent and protector
'one of the objectives sought by abandoned institutionalized. ISOLATION OF CHILD VICTIMS OF CRIME NETWORK PEDO- In fact, the trap and 'to make believe that the child will be placed in a "neutral
" to enable the "justice" to make decisions in the' best interests "of the child. In this way, the child finds himself placed in an institution for a long period and therefore, under judicial control. This thing will lead the child to feel punished for having spoken of the sexual violence that has undergone. So, baby, already a victim of sexual abuse, becomes the victim of judicial abuse. As a result, under the weight of these feelings of guilt, the child will have it difficult to trust again on his experience of the victim. The child suffers from a deep feeling of abandonment in front of this heavy burden of sexual trauma suffered, forced to carry it alone and in silence. More ', the feeling of hopelessness of the child victim of sexual abuse and placed in an institution, will be accentuated by the fact that is found separated from his family background and his father protector. Article 38 of Decree aid to youth '(in Belgium) and' become a trap for the innocent victims who were raped and protector for the parent. In fact, delegating their "power of decision 'to the Director of SAJ (Service to Help Youth') or SPJ (Judicial Protection Service), some judges are taking responsibility away from the front to protect actual values of the child against sexual perpetrators. If the parent and protector is not 'agree with this decision by the placement of SAJ or SPJ, he can make an appeal on the basis of Article 37 of the decree to aid youth'. However, and 'should know that this alleged action and' a trap for the victims, as often, the parent is found before the same court of minors who, in most cases, confirms the decision of the Director of the aid for youth ', that' the decision to place the child in the institution away from its parent protector. So the cycle and 'closed! The tactics of these perverse institutionalized and 'to imprison the child away from the protective parent. So, the child finds himself in an institution of the state, "waiting" for a decision to fix the parent permettrà executioner and protector. The placement in an institution serves as a springboard to the judicial institutions in order to have control over decisions quickly moving away from its parent the child's guardian. We believe that will be one period of employment " very short " to allow you to "take a certain distance 'and to allow the Justice " to clarify the situation " ... They will tell you also that" ' in ' interest of the child " (nice phrase used in all ways for you to bite the bullet!). The first objective sought by the pedo-criminal network 'and then reached: isolate the child victim as well forbid him to speak about sex crimes suffered. Despite these pressures and suffering of these, if your child has the courage to speak again about his traumatic experience, the perverse institutionalized states that the child "has much fantasy 'oe' state ' alienated" by the parent guardian, and then " not 'credible' . In this way, by not protecting my children against sexual violence they have suffered and reliability in the context pedophile father, the judicial system and istuzionale of Mons (Belgium) becomes complicit in these crimes. My children have become "the object of blackmail" to force me to remove the criminal charges and to close all proceedings against the father, and grandfather Rocco Antonini, Roberto Antonini. When I lived in Belgium with my girls, I knocked on all doors in Belgian institutions for help (Child Focus, Aid to Victims, Aid to the Youth Service ', SOS Children, Association for Children, etc.).. All these institutions that reassure the collective consciousness, after the Dutroux affair in Belgium, and try to prove that the child and 'secure and well protected in this country! The vise is closing around us! Me and my girls were desperate and nobody helped us, we were stuck! My girls are victims of a pedophile network. seeks justice for five years already! We still believe as ongoing judicial proceedings. However, I hope for my daughters who are currently in the hands of these criminals and that this justice is not a utopia! Justice when the truth becomes a utopia and 'hampered by corruption. The only way to ensure the manifestation of truth, in a democratic country, and 'to allow citizens to keep a critical eye on conduct of court proceedings relating to pedophilia . This information through channels that provide access to a wide audience, such as the Internet and the media (when they maintain their independence and have the courage to tackle the problem of child abuse crime! In Belgium, in my case, and 'l' absolute silence from the media!). Despite all the pressures and retaliation that the authority of Mons made me suffer so far, I continue to fight for the manifestation of the truth about the rapes and prostitution of my daughters. Despite my deep sadness and broken heart of a mother, they resist the blackmail of me to stop because the court proceedings would leave my children to their experience of rape victims. For victims of sexual crimes, and 'vital to rebuild, to have a recognition of this status of victim. Mons authorities have wanted to reverse the values into believing that my girls were the victims instead of being liars. This attitude is' a denial of justice in respect of my girls and then denying the right! We should not be leading experts in judicial matters to understand that as part of my file, the arbitrary interpretation of law by the authority of Mons, and especially its non-application , are intended for the sole purpose of hiding the TRUTH 'of abuse of my children, thereby protecting an organization pedo-criminal! We all understand, at least I certainly, that this story "soprapassa" the Antonines and that the decisions of the justice of Mons (Belgium) are systematically oriented in favor of the Antonines, the sole purpose of protecting other people complicit in these crimes inflicted on my children . This, despite an impressive number of witnesses, statements and medical reports of psychological assessment on the credibility of the revelations of abuse from my first-born child. Fiona was four and a half years when you are 'expressed on the sexual violence suffered by his father, his paternal grandfather and other adults (in January 2004). She continued to speak and to draw the horror of his experience at the end of May 2007, a few days before his return to Belgium. So, over three years, my daughter had the courage, despite three in institutions to tell and ask "help" in order, we adults, free from all these sufferings. But he had no authority, right now, the will to oppose these crimes and to protect my girls. WHY?? The freedom that I have been unlawfully deprived as a result of illegitimate arrest warrant issued by the Court of Mons (Belgium); UNLAWFUL the abduction and the kidnapping of my daughters to the Belgian authorities, the separation from my daughters and rejection (illegal) of any contact with the mother Lora, the entire maternal family and my children (two years have elapsed!) the total lack of protection for my girls against sexual violence they still continue to suffer today at the paternal accusations not based on my sanity issued by self-styled psychologists incompetent (C-bex of Mons-Charleroi: Mrs Regina Laurence, Mrs. Isabelle Fadeur, Lord Baeskens-Alain Charlier , Mrs. Natacha Delmotte ) on the basis of a report container ( Mrs. Saint Huile) ; false ideological and slander written against me by people I do not know ( SPJ Mons: Mrs. Anne Leth-de Greef, SOS-Enfant de Mons: the lord Gallez Michel ) documents in the file disappeared into thin air, (intentionally made to disappear), the emotional blackmail of the Director of the aid to the youth 'of Mons (Bensaid Taoufik lord), the process for me ... represent a huge violation of the Convention on the Rights of Man and the Child, created by the authority of Bishop and perpretata It 's time to stop the Court of Mons to act illegally and outrageously against the crimes and abuses inflicted on two innocent victims, who are my girls. With their decisions (civil procedures voluntarily slowed and accelerated storage of criminal dossier), the authorities of deliberately covering Mons and clearly criminal acts of the Antonines becoming accomplices. Their decisions have lost all credibility in front of Belgian and international front to the Italian authorities, because they voluntarily raise my children in a state of permanent danger represented by sexual violence and abuse who suffer in the context in which their father are currently . So it 'urgent that these serious crimes and inhuman cease! The visible and very real failures that appear in my file are clear evidence of an intention to harm the manifestation of the truth about the rapes committed against my children by Antonini and values accomplices. ISOLATION OF PARENT The parent
PROTECTOR protector, trusting in the justice of his country and aid institutions for children, will be reflected as anyone other parent in the same situation, to apply them to deposit the revelations of abuse suffered by her child and hope so that these institutions may field any kind of countermeasures that may protect the child the best possible victim of abuse .. Alas, the parent will realize quickly protector of his great loneliness in front of the help they wanted to have her baby, especially when the wicked will understand that institutionalized want to separate from him, and charged with a "pseudo-hazard
'for, so, discredit and bury the truth about his criminal acts committed by members of the child pedophile network. How to isolate the parent protector that is' what he wants to protect her child from sexual violence that has suffered? The objectives sought by abandoned institutionalized are identical to those sought to isolate the child victim of sexual abuse, namely: Isolation psychological parent Make no credible protector labeling it as "alienating
" for her child, that 'hit the " parental alienation syndrome (SAP). The SAP and 'was defined in 1986 by Richard Gardner, professor of child psychiatrist at the University of Columbia. According to him, involves a psychological disorder that affects a child when his parents draw upon him, in an implicit way, a "brainwashing" in order to destroy the image of the other parent. When the operation is' successful, the child rejects or demonize parents who first loved. This theory 'is not dangerous but its foundation in the use they make the perverse institutionalized, so, proceed to removal of the protective parent from her child. In fact, this theory 'is often used in legal proceedings as a strategy to discredit the father and protector, and then make it hard to believe the revelations of abuse suffered by her child. The perverse institutionalized declare that the parent has a protector " symbiotic relationship" with her child, and that '" alienating" him and then, and' ' dangerous. " In this way, we proceed to the placement of the child in an institution for removal of its parent protector. This theory will be used in cases where there are no physical signs of sexual abuse on the child . Instead, in cases of child victims of sexual abuse where there are physical signs of such abuse (anal fissures, vulva, vaginitis, hymen injury), the perverse institutionalized declare that the parent and guardian 'suffering from a psychiatric illness, " Munchausen syndrome by proxy . This syndrome is' a disorder of the behavior of an adult against a child or adult on the child abuse that is voluntary in the provocation of physical or psychological symptoms. In this way, label the parent as protector " alienating 'or' ill dangerous", it will be 'easy for the perverse institutionalized, separated from her child. The abuse of these two theories in the legal procedures will add another trauma to the child because it will not be believed in his dramatic story, and then, it will be totally denied any confidence in his description of the suffering and violence. physical isolation and / or geographical This second stage 'in a row to the first (psychological isolation). In this case, the parent guardian, called 'dangerous' by the wicked will be institutionalized in a psychiatric facility or isolated carcerale. Social isolation
professional
: This third stage and 'consecutive to the previous two (physical and psychological isolation and / or geographic). The aim sought by abandoned and institutionalized 'to isolate the parent protector from its social context and family impair his psychological identity, social and professional. The costs for the procedures and institutional Guridi and persecution against the parent guardian will increase its economic and psychological despair. The expenses for legal procedures and 'other means used by abandoned institutionalized to prevent the manifestation of the truth of the crimes inflicted on the child victim, so to prevent a parent guardian to continue its prosecution. All this and 'the reflection of our drama in five years to safeguard groped for my two girls from the hell of paedo-criminality. I want to clarify that my experience belongs to me and therefore I do not want to transpose to other situations. You do not even want to generalize my story, and that 'guided by perverse institutionalized to protect criminal, rather than directing it towards the protection of my girls. Would be unreasonable of me to say that all persons employed and working at the Court or in the institutions of Mons (Belgium) are corrupt or do not fully assume their responsibilities. The perverse in institutions that have played a role in protection of my children will not recognize it and will one day serve their lora consciousness, hoping that they have one! The much sought help for my girls and I have not found in Belgium, I was forced to come to Italy in order that justice be done and that, finally, my children are recognized as victims of sexual abuse by the father (Rocco Antonini ) of his grandfather (Robert Antonini ) and other adults ( his father and grandfather brought my little girl, Fiona, in different places where other adults were present and they abused her and other children-there is evidence about the acts already). Following the European arrest warrant for child abduction issued by Veronique Laloux judge of the Court of Mons (Belgium ), have been arrested in Italy. I stayed four days in jail and sixteen days of house arrest. Afterwards, I was judged by the Court of Appeal of Ancona (Italy) and unconditionally released. At the time of my arrest, my children were torn from me and placed in an institution in Italy for 7 months. I have had the right to visit only two months after the placement of my girls, with only four hours a month for meetings. My girls were desperate and felt lost in a foreign context because they did not know and understand the Italian language (mother tongue as the Lora French) and they were torn by Lora family values and family references. Despite pressure from the Belgian authorities to repatriate my girls, the Court of Appeal of Ancona (Italy) has revoked the return to Belgium, taking into account the danger that they would could run if they were returned to their father in Belgium. There are no words to express the immense suffering that I, my children and my whole family have tried and still try. E 'slow and painful agony (death to Goggins) that we experience in our daily lives, this impotence in front of people who are close and who support us, but also in front of the cowardice and the absolute indifference of the authorities and institutions that could make decisions for the preservation of my kids, and do nothing! On May 17, 2007, the Juvenile Court of Ancona (Italy), which had no authority has issued a decision on the return of my daughters, Belgium. This decision ILLEGALLY then rode the Court of Appeal of Ancona (who had previously revoked the return). On May 19, 2007, in secrecy more 'absolute and without being informed, my girls were taken during a walk with other children from the home, and returned to Belgium by their father executioner. In May 2008, the Supreme Court of Cassation in Rome quashed the ruling of the Juvenile Court of Ancona, admitted his incompetence and said the maintenance of my daughters on the Italian territory. But it was too late! My girls are currently in Belgium! have passed two years that I have no news of them . The father and perverse institutionalized Mons categorically opposed to any contact between me and my girls (not even on the phone!), completely uninterested dellinteresse of my girls and totally denying international law on the Rights of the Child and the Man. Despite several requests that I and my parents have filed for these contacts, the authorities of Mons (Belgium) remain tight and use different excuses to remove these contacts: slowing of civil proceedings, referring to the role of hearings, dates of hearings set to long periods (9 months to a year of two hearings), ... The total denial of contact with my children need, for the perverse institutionalized as emotional blackmail to make me take off and drop the pending criminal proceedings, and then delete my allegations of rapes of children borne by the father, paternal grandfather and the 'X' (others complicit in this network). I n fact, December 21, 2007, the Director of the Department of Judicial Protection and Aid to Youth 'Mons, Bensaid Taoufik lord, I convened a meeting planned for December 20, 2007. I could not be blocked because this in Italy following the European arrest warrant issued by my ex-husband for child abduction ANTONINI Rocco (this arrest warrant was lifted in Italy). So just my lawyers, the father and his lawyer could be present at the meeting of the SPJ. During this interview, the gentleman Bensaid Taoufik stated that a telephone contact was allowed between me and my two girls 21 December 2007 at 17. A simple phone call is for me great hope because I have no news of my daughters as they were deported from Belgium that is' May 19, 2007 (then 10 months had elapsed). Each contact also phone I was denied by his father and his lawyers, the lawyer BARTHELEMY Jean-Emmanuel and the Advocate DEPETRIS Nathalie, lawyers of the Bar of Mons (Belgium). On December 21, 2007, on the phone instead of hearing my girls, as was expected, I spoke with the director of SPJ, the lord Bensaid. An hour of conversation where he explained to me that I had to stop the "war", "change attitudes" and "avoid making too much noise" around this story if I wanted to see my girls. Bensaid The Lord prompted me to take the accusations of pedophilia against the father and grandfather. Recently, at the hearing on April 22, 2009 , Judge of the Court of Appeal of Mons (Belgium) decided to postpone the hearing until May 13, 2009 in order to organize the arrangements for contact with the web-cam, between me and my girls. Further improvements are clear that the authority of Mons have accelerated the filing of criminal dossier for rapes of children borne by Antonini (father and son). In fact, four days before the preliminary hearing for the postponement of the trial before the Court of Roberto Antonini Fermo (Italy), the Court of Mons had decided to close the criminal instruction based on the same facts (strupr minors). In the only attempt to demonstrate to the Italian authorities that no charges against Antonini, quickly storing the file penalty. Despite this decision Belgian the Court of Fermo (Italy) has maintained the trial court of his grandfather and set the criminal trial for July 8, 2009, for crimes of rapes of minors against Roberto Antonini. against this decision storage on the dossier Belgian criminal, I filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, 5 May 2009. Following this, the father and his lawyer, the lawyer Jean-Emmanuel Barthélémy (hole Mons-Belgium) wrote to the judge of the Court of Appeal of Mons, so to express opposition to the resumption of contacts lora between me and my girls (see the letter from Barthélémy, dated May 11, 2009). In his letter, the lawyer Barthélémy explains this refusal, as follows: "... not 'possible for my client to take any agreement because we were informed that Mrs. Maoloni lodged an appeal against the decision to close issued by the Court of Appeal of Mons on April 21 and the storing of criminal procedure ... As for the criminal proceedings in Italy, I have no information about the intentions of Mrs. Maoloni regarding the maintenance of criminal proceedings against my client, in Italy. I suppose, following the appeal in cassation introduced in Belgium, that the procedure will be continued in Italy against my client. So, you will understand that in this context, my client dell'attegiamento expressed reservations against the other party and therefore, can not 'be assured regarding the intentions of Mrs. Maoloni that persists to present him as "a pedophile in power." No agreement will be accepted at the hearing on May 13, 2009 ... " The minutes of the hearing on April 22, 2009 (see Annex), the judge of the Court of Appeal of Mons, the lord-Pierre Wustefeld André says ".... parties must provide a mechanism that will respect the interest of girls and party, to begin a reconstruction of the bond between girls and Maria-Pia Maoloni. In this sense, to allow the parties to submit to the Court for a specific device, and with the approval of the Public Ministry, the Court shall refer the case to continue the hearing on May 13, 2009 at 17:40 for 20 '. " Strangely, the hearing on May 13, 2009, that court had a totally different attitude and decided to refer the case to November 2009 (ie, 'Six months' later!). What 'happened between the hearing on April 22 and May 13 of that? The answer 'I have the appeal filed May 5, 2009, against the decision to close a criminal dossier on the rapes of minors. In fact, through this action, keep open the criminal proceedings in Belgium. In this context, and 'easy to see that the interest of my children and their welfare are completely trampled by abandoned institutionalized Bishop Their goal is' to close the most' soon, this issue seems to disturb the Belgian criminal lora tranquility . You are of my daughters as the subject of emotional blackmail to be able to submit to the dictatorship that is evident everywhere lora between the lines of my file, "as long as you continue your battle, never again see 'your girls! "The perverse institutionalized Mons use my children as a means of retaliation to force me to remove my reported rapes of children, so they can put a lid on this hot potato that so disturbs the serenity of this perverse criminal pedophile network. The immeasurable love I feel for my children and faith, to guide me in this fight hell and I hope to help maintain a clean and independent justice where "the law and 'equal for all" and where the victims, my daughters, will be recognized in their status as victims to rebuild in this world of adults who left their indelible and painful scars. I hope that justice is not just an illusion! Justice and 'human and therefore has certain limits: that of theoretical knowledge, as knowledge exact facts, those of individual choices in order to remain intact despite the pressures ... It will be our perseverance and our intolerance of child abuse that will save all the children who need us to live with dignity in this world. Pedophilia is like a social cancer because beyond the perversion of individual we need to fight people and sometimes whole institutions who, behind their social function and self respect, protect and facilitate their pedophilia in all its forms. Maoloni Maria-Pia

"Save a child and 'save humanity'

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Where Can I Get Pokemon Silver For Vba

CENSORSHIP OF CASE Maoloni / ANTONINI BY THE JUSTICE OF MONS / BELGIUM

CENSORSHIP OF ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT / PRINCESS OF CROY

Jan Boeykens 'FREEDOM OF THE PRESS'

Princess J. de Croy has just received a letter recommended that the Federal Police with a copy of the indictment of Magistrate Véronique Laloux for the judicial district of Mons.

Mons, 04/09/2010
Federal Police
Subject: Transmission of an indictment
Madam, Please find enclosed the r. .. équisitoire that Mrs. Laloux Magistrate in Mons, asked us to send you. Accept, Madam, our distinguished salutations
Frédéric Lefebvre, Chief Inspector
Judicial Police Officer
Federal Judicial Police - MONS
Regional Computer Crime Unit

------
Cabinet Véronique Laloux
Magistrate
District Court of Mons
35 de Nimy, 7000 Mons
Tel: 065 35 65 36
Fax: 065 59 56 98
File No. J8/06/073 - 90/drfond/10
No records 40.L4.122051/06

Submission
We, Véronique Laloux, J. instruction to the trial court in Mons, Mons Judicial District, Province of Hainaut;
Given the order date;
We require: ° Jacqueline De Croy, Croy Foundation Princess Street to Faider 1060 Brussels - to immediately block or to delete links and versions listed below:

http://maoloni.droitfondam ental.eu /? P = 39
http://maoloni.droitfondam ental.eu /? P = 7
http: / / maoloni.droitfondam ental.eu /? p = 1
- to kindly treat this as URGENT indictment;
- transmitting information on computer and send them directly by e-mail mail to the PJF de Mons - RCCU section - to the attention of Mr. Frederic Lefebvre, an investigator at the address: @ cti.pjf.mons edpnet.be
Develop a report at all dated and signed, taking care to remind our references listed under headings. (Indictment in two copies signed)
Mons, on 08/04/2010
The Magistrate V. Laloux

v \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} o \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} w \\: * { behavior: url (# default # VML);}. shape {behavior: url (# default # VML);} / * Style Definitions * / table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0; mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0; mso-style-noshow: yes; mso-style-parent: "" mso-padding-alt: 0cm 5.4 pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0in; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001 pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language: # 0400; mso-fareast-language: # 0400; mso-bidi-language: # 0400;}

previous reactions to censorship ordered by the court Friday November 20, 2009

By admin

http://maoloni.droitfondamental.eu/?p=88

The press release of the Support Committee of Maria-Pia Maoloni on the day of

this hearing is also censored. 7 Responses to "Reactions to previous censorship ordered by the court"

admin

20 November 2009 to 6 h 01 min

"The right of children":

Two delegates from the "Rights of the Child" (Belgium) were presented on Wednesday, slightly ahead, facing the room H (Youth Room) of Courts of Justice of the Canton of Mons. The bailiff asked about serenity of the reason for their attendance and confirmed that the hearing was indeed public and that they were free to access any of the hearing room without any formalities.

After a few minutes, they saw happen Madame Cosima Marchese, grandmother of Fiona and Milla small, accompanied by a person who will testify during the trial to be held on 12.09.2009 in Fermo, Italy, against grandfather's small. Moreover, one of the delegates had the privilege of being verbally abused and assaulted by this gentleman in the presence of The Court or the presiding judge and the prosecutor and counsel to respective (and Delogne Depetris). This gentleman XXX approached observers asking them straight out what they were doing there in the midst of the public. They told him they were politely as observers. "As an observer of what? - As an observer of the "Right of Children." - And what right do you come here to accuse me? Like everyone else here, and this one, the Duchess! You are all with them, what I've done? What you are looking for by coming here? He was told this gentleman, and later to President the court itself, they were not involved in the case and they came specifically from Brussels, as observers.

The tone of the "gentleman in question" had significantly higher and aggressively so that everyone picks his words well. Neither the president nor the prosecutor did not move, nor did the two policemen, while the hearing was greatly disturbed by these comments. Again, he was calmly replied to this gentleman that he was not allowed to speak to people and such a tone and that nothing was to warrant, the hearing is public. At this time, the bailiff served him to sit down and reminded him that he should remain silent.

A general astonishment, after being taken aside by the character who did not get involved in this trial, counsel for the parent of small spoke to the president and remarked that among the public, there must be people who certainly would testify against his client before the Italian courts and that this situation was unhealthy.

Everyone has asked what there was unhealthy but the president then demanded that everyone assumes his identity and the bailiff went up identity cards except the two delegates from Brussels since he already knew and were known outside the business. The clerk, in a hostile manner, recorded the identities on the computer and counted the attendance reporting to the President that the number of ID cards do not match. Many people are so out of the room spontaneously (which we find ourselves a little later in the concourse, accompanied by the release RTL TVI). Indeed, making the appeal, the clerk was able to determine that both Brussels had not submitted their ID card. The man was then lifted, apologized to the president, explaining the reason for his presence but surprised that they claimed identities in a public hearing. The President replied that his policy was in the room and he asked to leave: the response was polite and without arrogance "there is no problem." A police officer who demanded the board president of "The Rights of the Child", it replied that she had in the car and he could accompany him if he wanted. Tentatively, the king's attorney reminded the president that they had agreed to maintain the serenity of the debates. At no time did counsel Maria Pia Maoloni reacted when he should speak out against the intervention of the grandfather and against infringement of individual freedom at the level of identity. In fact, Maria Pia was not present, his family was able to logically attend the debates.

Once out of the courtroom, the officer again demanded identity cards and the man has done: he asked him if he would still attend the hearing and it was said no. The association president, she was denied to get his card. The officer, accompanied by his colleague, he then said they should stop it forthwith. Thus, the president and the first officer (this one unarmed) left the building.

To everyone's surprise, everyone in the audience, including Mrs. Marchese were asked the bailiff to go out and announced that the hearing was now closed. More surprising still, the parent of small and his father are still remained, as well as counsel for the trial of this action brought by Maria Pia Maoloni cons present her children to the "father" and against the breach of his human communication with her children since these people have officially custody, almost three years now (1040 days).

must add that the great-grandfather who was asked to present his identity card and said he did not have it on him, has pas été tenu, lui, «d’aller la chercher » et qu’il a pu rester dans la salle simplement en disant qu’il était le grand-père (sort que n’a pas connu Cosima Marchese, la grand-mère maternelle). Les exigences légales mises en avant pour les Maoloni devraient tout de même s’appliquer à tous : il est tout à fait inacceptable que les « deux poids, deux mesures » que nous constatons depuis six ans continuent ainsi dans un déni de justice permanent.

La journaliste, Sophie de Brabandere, accompagnée de son caméraman, nous a demandé comment il était possible que cela se déroule ainsi. Nous avons répondu qu’il There were already six years since this happened and so we already have presented our identity cards on several occasions and that some of us had even been searched under the pretext (invoked by the party his father) that we were "dangerous and armed! We contacted our impression that these people were playing by the Court each time with the whims and wishes improbable saw themselves whenever heard. We noted that the maternal grandparents had never seen their granddaughters and vice versa and that is violated here, frankly, the Convention of Human Rights because that right is inalienable: the girls were in different times, placed in institutions for long periods, while the maternal grandparents could quite legally entrusted to them. We recalled that his grandfather had been twice convicted for trafficking in fake paintings but, more importantly, he was under criminal trials in Belgium and, more seriously, in Italy, for the rape of his granddaughters, prostitution child custody and child-pornographic material.

Once the hearing ends, Cosima Marchese and witness were able to speak with counsel Maria-Pia, Delogne master, and we found ourselves in the maternal grandparents to comment on the afternoon that we had to live.

We all talked by phone with Maria Pia as well as Nancy Andrew, president of Solidarity International Kidnapping. "

People in the support committee of Maria Pia Maoloni and daughters know that the grandfather XXX pressured and threatened to various witnesses throughout the past six years. Several members of the public who came out during the making of identities, have for fear that their identity be disclosed to this person, also for fear of reprisals from her hand on them or their children. A people's committee reported that on the evening of the day Maria-Pia left Belgian soil to go to Italy for help, he discovered that his office had been systematically searched. The lawyer then compromise in defense of Maria Pia, Jean-Maurice Arnould, proved to be secretary of the company "House Losseau" through which [the grandfather] has passed some of his mistakes. It is very clear again that stressed the fact that "Maria Pia is pushing the illegality." The opposing party has been warned of a "child abduction", the police had instigated a European arrest warrant against the victims and an arrest ensued in the Marche, Italy, on person of Maria Pia. Subsequently, however, the Italian courts have ruled in favor of Maria Pia Maoloni (on appeal and cassation), and thus the court dismissed the petitions of Mons. Since then, these same courts have charged the Italian paternal grandfather, of Italian origin, and a trial was initiated against him. Similarly, a query referring to the same legal facts of the indictment was filed against the father (sire small Fiona and Milla). Currently, the trial of charges against the grandfather started since 23.09.09, the investigation procedure is being the father.

Support Committee, 11/18/2009

Louis Le Tallec

March 17, 2010 at 10 am 35 minutes

I support this cause

Jeanne Comte-Gaz

March 18, 2010 at 1 h 38 min

This is unacceptable. I have the impression that the father and the grandfather know something about someone fairly high up. If it was not the case this story would be solved long ago.

Cecile

March 18, 2010 to 5 h 07 min

is a shame for Belgium, that left the Italian Mafia fit into their country and leave two little girls being raped by their grandfather and father, for fear of what??

Annick Rault

March 26, 2010 at 11 h 07 min

Hi I'm from Mauritius or the courts are very corrupt in the chapter of pedophilia. They are organized systematically for predators of a "big" boss business or government is involved. My husband, company director, and regular contact with our local ministers and also note with great local economy, surprised in flagrante delicto of touching our daughter 4 months At the material time arrested by the police and released on bail, is now washing of all charges. Certificates of lawyers and photos of our baby gender wounded by his father are in the police files, as well as evidences of its membership has many pornography sites. At no time my testimony or that of doctors who established the crime have been required by the court. Worse, a divorce has been pronounced MY fault recently, and my ex husband is free to take him under his roof our 4 year old child. In fact my lawyers in league with those of my husband having consulted seem to get away from court on the day of the pronunciation of my divorce. I'm training or try to fight with my certiicats of lawyers to prevent our little is left alone with his father, but I keep some hope that the fight stops one day. I continue my fight, and fight to the death for my daughter.

renaud

April 14, 2010 at 7 am 31 min

It is now clear that child crime has infiltrated the elite circles of society: judges, politicians, academics, senior police officers ... etc.

how else to explain "their" attitude if they don ' were not put themselves into question by this case (these cases should I say, because networks of pedophiles who have with impunity, and for good reason, there are in all countries)

7 .

Agnesina Pozzi

14 avril 2010 à 12 h 58 min

It 'really a shame that a judge imposes silence on what Maoloni Maria Pia, mother of Fiona and Milla complaint. I wonder what emotional health may have some judges may involve so much abnormal as to create serious concerns about the quality of their work, and what they can to ensure two girls entrusted to their torturers and private instead of THREE YEARS OF CONTACT WITH THE MOTHER.

I have no words, I am shocked! And while in Belgium there are many good people is equally certain that even the happy island of pedophiles, news and developments in the life ... Someone

before God, the supreme court, must one day give an account of what he has decided, in defiance of any basic right that every constitution provides. Fiona and Milla are two private girls' childhood, his mother, innocence, and justice on earth. Silence is the only way to put our heads in the sand but now it is late, the world of Internet can not be silenced by any court ...

Agnesina Pozzi

Censure sur l'affaire belge Maoloni

Mercredi, avril 14, 2010 By President

http://tevirepedo.droitfondamental.eu/?p=257&cpage=1 # comment-179

Belgian court has ordered the Mons censorship blog Maoloni case. We therefore recast the story, but no other names as the actors of the judiciary, we only ask you to judge the comprtement. The couple lived near Mons, Belgium, with their two little girls loved each other and like any young couple. He is a teacher in a center for disabled children near Charleroi and her psychology teacher in higher education in the region of Mons. The paternal grandfather is a character disorder, sentenced Case Glineur-Opportunities for trafficking fake paintings in 1998 and 2006 with the complicity of lawyers, notary and other notables in the region of Mons and Brussels. (* 1)

The marriage collapsed In January 2004, following revelations of Fiona, the eldest, who blames her father and her paternal grandfather of sexual abuse. She says she was abandoned to the abuse of other men in a luxurious place where there were other children. Maria-Pia discovered hundreds of photos of children on her husband's computer, and including pornography and torture.

The father treated his daughter a liar and left the matrimonial home within the week. He lodged a complaint against his wife for parental alienation, the day of departure. He returns a few days later, accompanied by his father and a locksmith, to steal the laptop and other video devices. Maria-Pia lodged a complaint against her husband and her stepfather of rape and fondling of minors, and theft. Both men were prohibited from seeing the children outside of the "meeting space".

The two girls were placed in institutions in December 2004 for six months under the pretext that the mother "Could become dangerous if another truth

[court] was emerging." This truth, here: The children would have been a lot of imagination. Their mother was guilty of parental alienation, a non-existent crime under Belgian law, and would have "self-inflicted wounds." Images stitched gender of children on the computer's father did not fall under child pornography. Justice Mons had designated the C-Bex center of Charleroi, where young psychologists had abounded in the direction of the father. Maria-Pia consulted Dr. Golzbergun, psychiatrist renowned expert in Brussels and in the Courts, which established after six visits, and a thorough examination of his personality, it is perfectly normal. Dr. Hebborn, another psychiatrist, Brussels, and also voluntarily consulted regularly during the placement of children, joined the opinion of his colleague and also attests to its normality.

Upon leaving the institution in June 2005, the primary custody of children is maintained through the mother visitation rights to the father, a weekend in two and half the holidays, but no contact with paternal grandparents. Some months later, Fiona and Milla cry and say they have trouble coming back from their father. Their mother brings them to a gynecologist. They suffer from anal fissures and vulvitis, evidence of sexual abuse. Mons Justice accuses doctors of having certificates of convenience!

Dr. Murillo Perdomo, PhD in psychology and an expert with the Courts, made the psychotherapeutic Fiona for over a year. He pointed to the prosecution of Mons, the children were in danger in the presence of their father and paternal in the middle. The court refused to hear, even when he moves to personally the hearing to protect these children. In response, the Belgian court placed the children in institutions during the summer of 2006, under the pretext of a "mother's stubbornness in wanting to prove what was not."

October 4, 2006, Maria-Pia who assumed legal custody of his daughters, took them to Italy. It took only forty-eight hours after the Belgian court to launch an international arrest warrant, accusing him of parental abduction, while international law does not consider parental abduction after five days.

Maria Pia was tossed in an Italian prison for four days and then under house arrest for two weeks. The girls are placed in an institution. They are allowed to see their parents only after three months, due to once every fortnight to turn.

The Italian court ordered the mother, based on the Belgian trial. Belgium granted exclusive parental rights to the father, based on the Italian trial, which is no less illegal because he had not yet responded to sexual abuse charges against him.

In October 2006 the Italian Court of Appeal ruled that there were no acts constituting parental abduction. Mr Dehalu, the Public Prosecutor of Mons, moved to Rome in November 2006. Not a chance: the Court of Appeals banned in December 2006, the repatriation of children, which was scheduled to be in a Belgian military aircraft! (*)

In May 2007, the Juvenile Court authorized the extradition of Italian children. The following year, in May 2008 the Court of Cassation quashed the decision, which means that the Italian Supreme Court considers that the repatriation of children in Belgium was illegal, and that the mother had not removed his daughters.

In December 2008, the grandfather who kept the Italian, the Italian justice indicted for possession of child pornography, prostitution and sexual abuse of children on the eldest granddaughters, while the Belgian justice has release him. A similar statement is brought against the father because they are accused of the same facts, but this requires more complex approaches, because it is Belgian.

Belgian court continues to deny the opportunity between mothers and daughters, even by telephone, a situation that persisted since May 2007 ... almost three years!

Organizations Civil Protection of Children and senate

In Belgium, the famous service "preventive measures vis-à-vis parents, or even child once alerted to a potential case sexual exploitation "Child Focus, a European center for missing and sexually exploited children, sent Maria Pia at SOS CHILDREN-Mons, which have never been willing to receive it. The Belgian press maintains the omerta. Justice Belgium imposes censorship in the history of former husband, whose names cover the Italian press since November 2006.

Maria Pia is a regular guest on trays of Italian television. Over eleven thousand Italians signed a petition for protection of Belgian girls before their extradition. Italian associations took to the streets: the protest marches have followed, including at the Belgian Embassy in Rome, June 20, 2007. Italian Senator Antonio Gentile asked to Clemente Mastella, the then Minister of Justice of Italy, a parliamentary question on possible "Pressures of Belgium, who were alleged to have been made during a trip to his Belgian counterpart, which was Laurette Onkelinx, at the time. Master Taormina, a famous lawyer in Italy, decided to take in hand, defending the interests of the mother of his daughters, and thus, to declare war on pedophilia in Europe.

VIDEOS TO SEE

DAILYMOTION

Part 1:

Part 2:

YOUTUBE

Part 1:

Part 2:
Part 3:

PETITION:

OF THE MOTHER:

See links with the association house Leon Losseau. An "association" is non-profit association, whose equivalence is the French association law 1901.

Source:

http://maoloni.droitfondamental.eu/?p=105 WAS

This entry is posted Wednesday, April 14th, 2010 at 11 h 43 min and is filed under

Tevirepedo . You Can Follow Any responses to this entry Through the RSS 2.0 feed .

7 Responses to "Censorship on the Belgian case Maoloni"

4 January 2010 to 16 h 21 min

This Must Be regarded by The Courts of Human Rights "should she present Her box

# 105

4 January 2010 to 16 h 55 min

How can we leave after accusations Fiona and Milla girls live with leursvioleurs Antonini; Or is the act of justice to condemn a mother who tries to save them (parental abduction, I laugh). Is not it normal for a mother (or father) to remove and preserve most of the ignominy and horror of his children. So there! I do not understand! Just a matter of diplomacy and laws governing country to country! A sick !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

# 106

5 January 2010 to 3 h 31 min

Belgian justice would be complicit? it would be invited in this famous castles? all this does not surprise me I

# 107

khaled1954

January 7, 2010 at 7 am 42 min

How can you leave after the Charges girls Fiona and Milla Antonini live with their abusers; Or is justice to condemn a mother who tries to save his children?. Is not it normal for a mother (or father) to remove and preserve most of the ignominy and horror of his children. So there! I do not understand! Just a matter of diplomacy and laws governing country to country! A vomit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!? WESTERN CULTURE IS

# 111

January 11, 2010 at 8 am 54 min

Being mom I still disgusted, saddened and a sense of impotence for this mom. How can you after all these examples do not react. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. This m'insupporte nothing than to know that girl is in the hands of this individual pervert. Much of their wasted life and that of the mother for whom I pray. Let us stop this tragedy

# 115

Maoloni MARIA PIA

31 May 2010 to 12 h 06 min

PLEASE HELP ME TO SPREAD THIS MESSAGE EVERYWHERE ... ON THE WEB SITES YOU, YOUR BLOGS AND 'ALL YOUR CONTACTS. THE BELGIAN AUTHORITIES HAVE OFF 'ALL MY BLOGS. HERE IS THE NEW THAT I HAVE JUST CREATE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH (31/05/2010)

BLOG TO SAVE FIONA AND MILLA FROM HELL OF pedocriminals';-CHILD VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AND PROSTITUTION AND DEPRIVED OF THEIR MOTHER AND MOTHER OF ALL PART FOR 3 YEARS!!

MY NEW BLOG:

http://fionaetmilla.blogspot.com/

FOR FIONA AND MILLA ANTONINI

MOMMA LIP PHONE: 0039 366 199 22 26

ONLY HOPE FOR A TOUCH WITH MY CHILDREN THAT I IS NOT NEW SINCE ALMOST 3 YEARS: SPREAD ACROSS THIS ISSUE ON THE NET AND 'ALL YOUR CONTACTS: 0039/366/199 22 26

HELP FIONA AND MILLA TO CONTACT ME ... I HAVE MORE OF MY NEW CHILDREN FROM 3 YEARS

MESSAGE FOR MY TWO KIDS: FIONA AND MILLA

ANTONINI,

MY DEAR, MY CHILDREN,

Here is the phone number where you can reach me: 0039/366/199 22 26

I n 't have any news of you for almost 3 years! Mommy will never leave you!

Know that I can to get in contact with you and all my family, but your father, SPJ Mons (Director: bensaid taoufik) and the Court of Mons prevent us from having these contacts with you!

I live in Italy and I can not go back for the moment, Belgium as there is a warrant for child abduction against me, issued by Belgium. The arrest warrant has been deemed unfounded by Italy, but Belgium did not want to cancel. In this way, they keep us separated, you and me in Belgium, Italy. But know that nothing and nobody can stop us from loving us!

LOVE IS STRONGER THAN ALL MY DEAR NEVER FORGET THAT I LOVE YOU infinity!!

Your dear mother, Maria-Pia Maoloni

(This number is strictly for my children. If you want contact me, thank you kindly write to me at the following email address:
mariapia@live.fr
)

Censorship Belgian trial of an Italian in Italy

Wednesday, April 14 , 2010

By admin

http://maoloni.droitfondamental.eu/?p=111

Belgian court ordered the censorship of information on the trial of an Italian charged in Italy for sexual abuse of a child and possession of child pornography in Belgium. Interest Information here is based on the difference between the treatment of these cases in Belgium and Italy. On the left, Maria-Pia crying, collapsed in pain, because the Belgian courts made him hope that she could finally talk to his daughters on the phone, but it has again been banned. Below, the humanity of tribubal Italian.

Censorship on the directives of the criminal policy of the Belgian Minister of Justice

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

By admin

http://maoloni.droitfondamental.eu /? p = 120

The Belgian court whose neutrality would be considered by the Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament soon, censorship hearing a report on a particularly vivid in the field. We modify the article to let it appear that there neutrality of the court which, under Belgian law, prosecutions depend "crime policy directives of the Minister of Justice and the Board of Attorneys General" .

CENSORSHIP ORDERED BY THE JUSTICE OF MONS / BELGIUM TO THE SITE cemab

http://www.cemab.be/news/2009/05/7299.php

A severe case of pedophilia hit Belgium and the Italy!
by Frank Martin Thursday, May. 28, 2009 at 1:24 AM Following an indictment by Judge Véronique Laloux, judge in the judicial district of Mons, the article was deleted.

An indictment allows a judge to require, under pain of imprisonment and fines, the administrator from one site to remove, block access to, or edit an article. Surprisingly, the legislature did not, it seems, expected recourse.

We have asked for more information. We had just been told it was an issue of defamation. No other explanation could be obtained.

A proposal (remove the names presented in the article, except those officials and legal advocates) was rejected, without giving any reason.

We therefore reluctantly withdrawing the article.

CENSORSHIP BY JUSTICE OF MONS / BELGIUM, ALL THE BLOGS OF THE MOTHER, MARIA-PIA Maoloni
All my blogs have been turned off overnight and without any prior notice!! My blogs have been created for the sole purpose of

denounce the crimes of sexual abuse and prostitution committed by the father (ANTONINI ROCCO) and paternal grandfather (ROBERTO ANTONINI) on my children, Fiona and Milla.

FOLLOWING THE BLOGS HAVE BEEN DELETED'S:

http://sauvons-fiona-et-milla.blogspot.com/

http://salvarefionaemilla.blogspot.com/

http://savefionaandmilla.blogspot.com/

http://fiona-milla.blogspot.com/

/ * Style Definitions * / table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0; mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0; mso-style-noshow: yes; mso-style-parent: "" mso-padding-alt: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0in; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001 pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; font -size: 10.0pt; font-family: "Times New Roman" mso-ansi-language: # 0400; mso-Fareast-language: # 0400; mso-bidi-language: # 0400;} http : / / mamanpia.nipox.com /
/ * Style Definitions * / table.MsoNormalTable {mso -style-name: "Table Normal" mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0; mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0; mso-style-noshow: yes; mso-style-parent: "" mso-padding -alt: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0in; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001 pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: "Times New Roman" mso-ansi-language: # 0400; mso-fareast-language: # 0400; mso-bidi-language: # 0400;} http://pia.nipox . com /