Saturday, May 23, 2009
Wheat Allergies More Condition_symptoms
SUMMARY BRIEFLY ... INTERVIEW WITH MYRIAM
Case Maoloni / Antonini: Maria-Pia Maoloni and Rocco Antonini lived near Mons, with their two little girls and got along without problems. He is a teacher in a center for disabled children near Charleroi and professor of psychology at tertiary and university in the region of Mons. Rocco is the son of Roberto Antonini, who was sentenced for trafficking in fake paintings in 1998 and 2006 with the complicity of lawyers, notary and notables (Glineur case) in the region of Mons and Brussels.
The marriage collapsed in January 2004, following revelations of Fiona and the discovery of pornographic images, some pedophilic tendencies as well as hundreds of photos of children and strangers on the computer Rocco. It's not about child pornography, is to decide later a judge. Fiona accused his father and his paternal grandfather. She also assured to have been abused by other men, in the presence of other children, giving descriptions of places they are luxurious and took photographs.
From these revelations, the father has treated her daughter a liar and left the matrimonial home in the week, the day he filed a complaint against his wife for parental alienation. He will not come until a few days later, accompanied by his father and a locksmith, to steal the laptop and other video devices. It is then a complaint against him and the grandfather of rape and fondling of minors and theft.
No real social and serious investigation has been made in the grandfather while Fiona has a lot of detail. However, they had the ban to see the children outside of "space encounter "but these visits were not always monitored.
The children were placed in December 2004, claiming that the mother "could become dangerous" if another truth (justice) was emerging. During this period the mother always accused of parental alienation, has striven to prove first that she was sane.
A report (unilateral) very careful of his personality has been established at its request, by a renowned psychiatrist at BXL, expert to the Courts to counteract the expertise made in Charleroi, a designated center for that purpose by the justice of Mons, but employing only young inexperienced psychologists. Another psychiatrist, BXL, it voluntarily and regularly consulted during this time of placement of children, also testified to his normality. In total, eight psychiatrists and psychologists expert (in Belgium and Italy) said that Maria-Pia Maoloni was sane, not dangerous neither for herself nor for her children or others, and it was a loving mother.
Upon leaving the institution, six months later (June 05), custody was awarded to the mother through a visitation to the father, without supervision, a weekend of 2 and half the holidays, but no contact with paternal grandparents. The result, after a few months, Fiona and Milla returned to their father crying, saying they were wrong. Gynecological examinations showed each time they had anal fissures and vulvitis, Fiona has even mentioned the touching she had suffered at the hands of his father in the emergency department of a hospital and several of Mons occasions to her GP and pediatrician. These elements have never been considered by the physicians who speaks of "complacency"! The master class by Fiona also testified, but this had no effect. More than 30 witnesses, most of which have filed a testimony to the police, were not considered.
Childfocus service and its famous "preventive measures vis-à-vis parents, or even child once alerted to a potential case of sexual exploitation," Maria Pia sent to SOS CHILDREN-Mons, which in turn has never been willing to receive it when the children complained coming back from their father.
Fiona would be a lot of imagination and their mother would have self-inflicted injuries to children, ensured the defendants contention that the prosecution was taken by the Mons. However, Dr. Murillo Perdomo, Ph.D. in psychology and an expert in the Courts (at a national and international), which has tracked psychotherapeutic Fiona for over a year, sent unsolicited statements to the prosecution of Mons for their report that children were in danger in the presence of their father and paternal in the middle, but they were never taken into consideration. Quite the contrary, justice considered this as a mother's stubbornness in wanting to prove what was not and decided to place children in institutions during the summer of 2006.
October 4, 2006, after almost two years, Maria-Pia took her daughters to Italy, which was the start of a crossover of emergency procedures. It took only forty-eight hours after the Belgian court to launch an international arrest warrant, accusing him of parental abduction when she had primary custody of her children at the time of his departure. She was imprisoned four days, then under house arrest for two weeks. By the time the Court of Appeal of Ancona (Italy) decreed that there were no facts constitute parental abduction in October 2006 and the releases in the meantime the Belgian court had deprived the mother of his rights and decided to return the children to the alleged pedophile, under the decision of the Juvenile Court of Ancona, which was based on the judgments of the Court Youth Mons, which granted the exclusive authority to the father.
The two children, they were set in an Italian institution from the beginning of their arrival in Italy, following the arrest their mother, both parents have the opportunity to see that after 3 months due to once every 15 days to turn.
Another Judgement of the Court of Appeal rejected the extradition Ancona children in December 2006. Despite this, the judge of the Juvenile Court decided to extradite the children in May 2007.
They have been kidnapped with the connivance of authorities in both countries. The children were returned to their father, whose rape investigation is still open in Italy and Belgium. In Italy, a cassation appeal has been launched against the decision repatriation of children.
Over eleven thousand Italians had signed a petition for protection before the expatriation.
In Italy, associations took to the streets: "Send lambs to the wolves weigh on the conscience of the Italian government," said Father Fortunato di Noto association METER (Syracuse). The protest marches succeeded. While
since November 2006, the names of Rocco and Maria Pia Antonini Maoloni cover the Italian press, web sites, that it is a regular guest on TV trays Italian, Belgian press has kept the omerta ( law of silence) about their history.
Senator Antonio Gentile has officially asked a parliamentary question to Clemente Mastella, Italian Minister of Justice, on the conduct of his administration and any "pressure from Belgium. Laurette Onkelinx would have intervened with the Minister Clemente Mastella, Italy during a trip to Rome. In November 2006 already, just before the Judgement of the Court of Appeals prohibiting the repatriation of Ancona, a Belgian military aircraft waiting to repatriate children; following the failure of the repatriation of the public prosecutor Mons Dehalu s' himself was moved to Rome.
An event took place June 20, 2007 at the Belgian Embassy in Rome to contest the decision to repatriate children.
Currently, a large Italian lawyer, Mr C. Taormina, decided to take charge of the case and thereby to declare war on pedophilia in Europe. While in Belgium things continue in silence ...
Regarding the medical-psychological component, at the request of counsel for the mother and two additional in-depth expertise of the mother were performed, one in Rome, the other Milan, by two leading experts the country (Prof. Bruno and Prof. Francesco. Gagliardi) and showing their team, on both sides, there is no presence of Munchausen syndrome by proxy at home and it poses no danger or for herself or for her children, or others.
other hand, the cassation appeal was won on 27 May 2008, he broke the ruling of the Juvenile Court of Ancona (which extradiait children in Belgium) and without appeal. This means that the Supreme Court considers that the repatriation of children is illegal in Belgium and there was no child abduction by the mother, the eyes of Italian justice.
Moreover, the Italian justice has continued his education on the facts of rape by grandfather (Italian citizen) and father, and this has led recently to the "reference to Judgement" from the Italian prosecutor and there will have a lawsuit against the grandfather including the initial hearing will take place on December 19, 2008 in Italy. Mom will be a civil party.
Since then, there was also opening a criminal investigation for acts of rape against the father in Italy, which required more complex approaches, as it is of Belgian nationality, but is currently in progress and risk follow that of the grandfather they are accused of the same facts.
should also talk about the latest expert Fiona drawings that were made recently by Dr.Crotti and Magni and certify that it is currently still undergoing sexual abuse.
To date, the mother still has no direct contact with her two young daughters (9 and 5 years) since the day they return, that is to say, early May 2007 and left without any contact with they and their father and his lawyer and the SPJ Mons refused him any contact, even telephone, which is unacceptable and constitutes in itself a denial of rights.
------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY
all began in 2004 when my eldest daughter, at the time of 4 years made me its horrible secrets about his father and his paternal grandfather. But she also told me about places where his father and father-gd brought and where other children were present. My daughter told me there were other adults who abused her and the children they also took pictures. My daughter has made many drawings of her ordeal and spoke to many witnesses (including physicians and specialists on duty, teachers); this until 2007.
Following his first revelations, I filed a complaint in Belgium (since I was born and have always lived in Belgium) 05.02.2004. I then made a party to a civil judge (Mons) May 27, 2004. The case is still open for now but I must say that huge discrepancies still remain: some missing pieces, the audio-k7 shot of my daughter, fake intellectuals, slanderous reports ...
An instruction for rape of minor dependents of the father and paternal grandfather is still ongoing in Belgium but also in Italy.
All court decisions have always been in favor of the father's family for four years, and this, in the district in Mons.
Even the Public Prosecutor has held positions still very partial and biased in favor of Antonini.
My children were placed in institutions twice, in the non-compliance with the fullest of the law and the decree of the Youth Assistance: In 2004, after my initial complaint and then, in 2006 following my other complaints. Indeed, despite the statement being made for dependents of manners of the father, the judge of the Court of Appeals decided a visitation for the father classic. During the period visits home, his father has done it again and again to violate my two children (5 years and 3 years). It was during this year that my oldest daughter but also the smallest, told me with their pain that they continued to suffer. I was lost, I was terrified that it still puts my children ...
So I decided to seek help in Italy (since I am of Italian descent). So I left my family in order to find a lawyer, totally independent of any outside influence of the Belgian system. I arrived in Italy on 04.10.2006. At this point, I had the care and accommodation principal of my children and the father had no right of access (as was to have children Saturday, 10/14/2006).
Without understanding what was happening, I was arrested on 07.10.2006 and my children torn from me and placed in an institution in Italy for 7 months.
I made 4 days in jail (without being informed of anything, I did not know why I was arrested!) And 14 days of house arrest. Then I was tried by the Court of Appeal of Ancona (Italy), which freed me unconditionally and has prevented my extradition to Belgium.
However, Belgium is still under the European arrest warrant issued by Judge V. Laloux. So if I return to Belgium, I'm going to jail!
I am very worried about the physical and psycho-emotional of my children who now are in the hands of these individuals. In addition, my children are completely denied their most basic needs because they prevented from having contact with me for almost a year and they must be wondering why they can not see their mom or even hear by phone! Emotional distress associated with this feeling of abandonment is against their well-being and their protection. I do not know what is happening in my file but all I can say as a mom is that I love my children and I wanted to save them from their abuse. This I did while respecting, in all these years, the current procedures, because I did and I always trust the Justice! Despite the fact that the Belgian authorities accuse me of child abduction, Italian authorities have found the opposite! That's why I live in Italy right now, but my life is in Belgium: my family and my children are there, my profession (I am a professor of educational psychology for 17 years); My house, my friends and my roots (since I was born in Belgium). I do not want to generalize the problems that I saw all the Belgian institutions on the contrary! I know, and I have proof from people who support me, there are people of integrity, fair and sensitive to our suffering. However, there are too many anomalies and bias in court decisions in Mons taken in favor of the father of lost parts in the folder, and the audio-k7 shot my daughter in 2004; documents not filed in folder, slanderous and false reports intellectuals from some of SOS-CHILD Mons and a delegate SPJ at the Mons ... All this is horrible and makes me very afraid because I think that to achieve this, to fabricate false reports about me is that it covers a huge thing that we do do not emerge! My children would not return to their father! Especially my eldest! She had an extreme fear of being alone with him and his grandfather! I long to have their news and hear their voice, hug and reassure them ... but can we prevent it despite all the "beautiful" international laws on the protection and safeguarding of the child! What happens beyond the Act is beyond comprehension! This story touches the extreme degree of cruelty and perversity. I seek help for my children! I wish that it provides a look, an analysis on my file (which in itself is not complicated but we wanted to make it complicated!) Outside the district of Mons!
In Belgium, I knocked on every door (sos-child, victim assistance, delegate rights of the child ...) but all these agencies are essentially service system before the service to the victim.
While the Italian press is following closely for over a year and a half, my history, the Belgian press, meanwhile, remained silent, despite my many requests!
I know this sounds incredible and being from another dimension, but believe me, all the many people who have closely followed my history have understood that there are great protections around the paternal family and c ' is why the rights of my children and mine have been systematically violated.
Maoloni MARIA PIA
/ * Style Definitions * / table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" mso-tstyle-rowband -size: 0; mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0; mso-style-noshow: yes; mso-style-parent: "" mso-padding-alt: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin : 0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001 pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: "Times New Roman" mso-ansi-language: # 0400; mso- Fareast-language: # 0400; mso-bidi-language: # 0400;}
/ * Style Definitions * / table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Tabella normal" mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0; mso-tstyle-colband -size: 0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} http://maoloni.droitfondamental.eu/?p=36
/ * Style Definitions * / table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0; mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0; mso-style-noshow: yes; mso-style-parent: "" mso-padding-alt: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0in; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001 pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: "Times New Roman" mso-ansi-language: # 0400; mso-Fareast-language : # 0400; mso-bidi-language: # 0400;} assigned two girls to their father before he has to respond to child abuse and possession of child pornography, and denied contact with their mother.
October 3, 2006: Maria Pia
Maoloni, who has custody and primary accommodation of her two daughters (the authority shared between both parents) went to Italy with his daughters, after which of them have passed the W / E spent with their father.
4 October 2006:
's mother arrives with her daughters to 18h in Italy. His lawyer, Arnold, faxed him a copy of the ruling yesterday by Judge Harvengt (art 38) to 12:05 pm at her home in Belgium. She can not have knowledge.
October 5, 2006:
At a meeting with the father and his lawyer, without a mother and her lawyer have been called, the SPJ (Judicial Protection Service) is providing accommodation for children the father's visitation rights being the next fortnight later.
October 6, 2006:
At the request of the father without the mother where his lawyer being informed, the court of Mons Launches European arrest warrant against the mother for child abduction, two days after their arrival in Italy, while the waiting period for parental abduction of at least five days. Similarly, he asked for interim relief, the sole authority and primary accommodation of children. Convening this hearing to happen at the home of the mother and October 9, 2009.
October 7, 2006:
The mother was arrested and detained in an Italian prison until October 11 and then under house arrest at her aunt until October 26 2006, and children are placed in institutions.
October 11, 2006: The
summary judgment of Belgian court assigned the exclusive authority and primary accommodation of children to the father.
October 12, 2006: The mother receives
Harvengt Judgement (s. 38) by fax from his Italian lawyers Minicis and learns the contents of the trial.
October 23, 2006: Master
Fax Arnould specifying that the mother had no knowledge of the trial and that, on its own initiative, called the decision, knowing that his client would automatically.
October 26, 2006: The Court of Appeal
Ancona frees the mother unconditionally.
December 12, 2006: The Court of Appeal
Ancona finds no child abduction and dismisses the repatriation of children in Belgium.
May 19, 2007:
Children are repatriated to Belgium, based on a decision of the juvenile court of Ancona, whose mother and his lawyer will not receive notification that May 23, 2007.
May 28, 2007: J.
Youth Belgian grants exclusive authority to the father and the father main accommodation
May 28, 2008:
The Italian Court of Cassation quashed the decision to repatriate children in Belgium in the father and confirms that there was no child abduction in the head mother, without recourse.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment